{"channel":"cities","content":"the new \"article\" code is committed.\r\n\r\nthis is ... fine.\r\n\r\nI'm not in a mood to write articles yet. Or to add the << navigation chrome >> to expose them.\r\n\r\ni am also very much not in a mood to migrate existing articles.\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nthe new navbar is too space-consuming.\r\n\r\npresumably the new option will be \"all channels\" or \"select channel from drop-down\".\r\n\r\nbut I don't really like that. ( i don't like the \"hover for sub-category\" option either)\r\n\r\n maybe I should consult a graphic designer. certainly Claude can't do it.\r\n the consensus of simpletons is not wisdom. if three LLMs agree on a bad approach, I shouldn't expect it to be good.\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nboth \"mail server\" and \"site dashboard\" seem like too much << work for work's sake >>.\r\n\r\nor, at least, \"work-lite\" tasks.\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nmeanwhile, commenting on things like << Gary Marcus' latest idiocy >> seems pointless. ( of course the \"pure LLM system\" isn't going to know *today's date* unless it is told that. You might as well be upset that the dictionary doesn't know the date.) ( if you look away from the sun, you will not see it)\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nI am disheartened by the \"get LLMs to write good CSS code\" attempts.\r\n\r\nNeither the design nor the structure of the output code is that good.\r\n\r\nOf course, \"go from a CSS text file to a visual design\" isn't a trivial task ... but it isn't *that* hard.","created_at":"2025-02-19T17:48:55.644818","id":242,"llm_annotations":{},"parent_id":240,"processed_content":"

the new \"article\" code is committed.\r

\n

this is ... fine.\r

\n

I'm not in a mood to write articles yet. Or to add the navigation chrome to expose them.\r

\n

i am also very much not in a mood to migrate existing articles.\r

the new navbar is too space-consuming.\r

\n

presumably the new option will be \"all channels\" or \"select channel from drop-down\".\r

\n

but I don't really like that. \n \ud83d\udd25\n ( i don't like the \"hover for sub-category\" option either)\n \r

\n

\n \ud83d\udca1\n maybe I should consult a graphic designer. certainly Claude can't do it.\r\n

\n

\n \ud83d\udd25\n the consensus of simpletons is not wisdom. if three LLMs agree on a bad approach, I shouldn't expect it to be good.\r\n

both \"mail server\" and \"site dashboard\" seem like too much work for work's sake.\r

\n

or, at least, \"work-lite\" tasks.\r

meanwhile, commenting on things like Gary Marcus' latest idiocy seems pointless. \n \ud83d\udca1\n ( of course the \"pure LLM system\" isn't going to know today's date unless it is told that. You might as well be upset that the dictionary doesn't know the date.)\n \n \ud83d\udd25\n ( if you look away from the sun, you will not see it)\n \r

I am disheartened by the \"get LLMs to write good CSS code\" attempts.\r

\n

Neither the design nor the structure of the output code is that good.\r

\n

Of course, \"go from a CSS text file to a visual design\" isn't a trivial task ... but it isn't that hard.

","quotes":[],"subject":"glendive (part 3)"}