bozeman (part 3)

the search for jobs is not yet bearing fruit.

part of this is that i am a complicated candidate, and we are in an era where many companies don't feel a need to take on the risks of complicated employees.

for Atacama, i could try to add LONDON. i could add "ratings" (like +110 or -20dB) based on content.

after watching the machine fail once at generating useful metadata for quotes, I am punting. for the limited situations where I care, I can enter it manually.

Programming with the LLM is something of a guessing game.

If I tell it to add a feature, will it do it correctly? Or, will I have to explain it more and more? Would it be faster to just write it myself?

And, if the machine is wrong, is it because the tool is immature and incomplete? Or was the idea incomplete?

more later.