2026-02-16 17:12:40

1. Regional fast-casual restaurant chain (~40 locations, 500 employees). Currently paying $50K–150K per year for point-of-sale, inventory management, scheduling, and loyalty systems from vendors like Toast or Square. Their general manager knows exactly what they need β€” she's been running restaurants for 20 years. A freely licensed scheduling and inventory system, generated by a large language model (LLM) and tailored to their specific supply chain (they source locally, their waste patterns are seasonal), replaces generic software-as-a-service (SaaS) with something that actually fits. If another regional chain forks the code and improves it for their context, the license requires those improvements to flow back.

2. Mid-market tax and accounting firm (~200 professionals, 500 total with admin and seasonal staff). Paying heavily for practice management software, document management, and client portals. Their workflows are highly specific β€” they specialize in multi-state businesses, and no off-the-shelf product handles their interstate allocation review well. A copyleft-licensed practice management platform, generated and customized with LLM assistance, replaces $200K or more in annual SaaS costs. The senior partners can describe exactly what the software should do because they've been doing it manually for decades.

3. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) contractor (500 employees across field and office). Job costing, dispatch, equipment tracking, warranty management β€” they use a patchwork of ServiceTitan, spreadsheets, and paper. Their operations vice president has a whiteboard in his office with the dispatch logic that no software vendor has ever captured properly. LLM-generated, freely licensed dispatch and job costing tools reflect his actual decision logic. The copyleft terms mean that if another mechanical contractor improves the estimating module, the improvements are shared.

4. Regional healthcare staffing agency (500 employees, placing nurses and allied health professionals). Credential tracking, shift matching, compliance documentation, client billing β€” they currently use a $300K-per-year platform that was designed for light industrial staffing and awkwardly adapted. Their compliance director knows every state board requirement by heart. A copyleft-licensed credentialing and matching system, built to their specification via LLM, replaces a tool that never quite fit. Competing staffing agencies in other regions can adopt it, but must share their improvements β€” building a cooperative infrastructure for an industry where the software was never the competitive advantage. Relationships and reliability are.

5. Multi-location auto dealership group (8 dealerships, ~500 employees). Customer relationship management (CRM), finance and insurance (F&I) workflow, inventory management, service scheduling. Paying CDK or Reynolds & Reynolds enormous sums for systems that are notoriously inflexible. Their F&I managers have precise processes honed over years that the software fights against rather than supporting. LLM-generated, copyleft-licensed dealership management tools match their actual workflow. The license is particularly interesting here because the dealer management software market is an oligopoly that charges exorbitantly β€” a shared, freely licensed alternative would break that lock-in for the entire industry, and the copyleft terms ensure no single dealership group can privatize the improvements.

6. Specialty food distributor (warehouse, delivery fleet, sales team β€” 500 employees). Route optimization, order management, lot tracking, customer-specific pricing. Currently patching together an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system that was designed for manufacturing with bolt-on logistics tools. Their logistics manager has route knowledge in her head that no generic optimizer captures β€” she knows which customers have loading dock restrictions, which ones need Thursday delivery because they're closed Friday, which drivers can handle the mountain routes in winter. A copyleft-licensed distribution management system built from her specifications via LLM replaces $100K or more in mismatched SaaS. The license means other specialty distributors β€” craft beer, organic produce β€” can adopt and extend it for their verticals.

2026-02-15 03:43:23

匹 levels of existence. πŸ’‘ you can add "the world" as a zeroth layer. πŸ”₯ we're uncertain if there is a layer below the atom layer.

ONE. The "organism" level. There are six billion homo sapiens on earth.

TWO. The "cell" level. There are thirty trillion cells in each homo sapiens.

THREE. The "atom" level. There are approximately one hundred trillion atoms in each cell.

Click title to read full message...

2026-02-10 20:00:37

εΎˆε€šηš„θ―­θ¨€γ€‚

你们ηŸ₯ι“ε—οΌŸ

2026-02-03 17:35:27

i ended the session on a "live screen".

two choices, both good.

2026-02-03 17:01:55

pause screens. πŸ”₯ or kill screens

when you load a video game, and it has paused just before a fight you can't win and you can't escape.

----

nobody likes loading a pause screen.

2026-02-02 03:29:01

various thoughts tonight:

  • perhaps Trakaido should be open-source? GPL-v3. βš™οΈ the math has changed. it is now economical to build and release GPL v3 code.
  • the blog post for Trakaido should be done on Tuesday?
  • re-inventing Atacama - a "three-screen" layout. for various audiences.
  • there will be emails soon.
2026-01-23 20:24:41

My list of "firmament words" βš™οΈ words that are too difficult to define without already understanding language at an advanced level, or that are so fundamental they are often embedded in grammar rather than stand-alone words from a few years ago:

Click title to read full message...

2026-01-19 05:16:29

I met a man who carried a Bible everywhere he went, he said that he walked with Jesus.

He did not call himself a preacher, but he talked mostly in Bible verses. I took no offense at that, but my romantic partner was somewhat agitated by it.

I must agree with her on one count: he did use a lot of words to say very little. He seemed to have taken inspiration from a certain type of low church βš™οΈ "High Church" is the bells-and-smells formal liturgy of an ancient and hierarchical church. "Low Church" is just a man with a bible and a voice. preacher, who can spend an hour talking about six lines of the Bible πŸ’­ the Catholics have 3 readings in their Sunday services. the Jews, never to be outdone, do seven ... in the original Hebrew. Many of the Protestant denominations can only find time for 1 reading, and not say very much interesting in that time.

----

He was of a persuasion that suffering leads one closer to the LORD, so one should strive to live a life full of suffering. This may not be as wrong as some readers may think it is, but I find it the conclusion of flawed logic.

It may be true that one must suffer in order to know the LORD.

It may be true that the LORD's presence is more easily reached by those in suffering.

But one must not treat it like opiates; living for nothing but the joy of suffering.

And one must not reach the point where one loves the suffering more than the LORD.

----

There are those who are called to a life of asceticism. But it is best if they know it comes at a cost; to themselves and those around them.

One might think that it is good that they live a life away from others; a hermit in the woods, or at least a celibate monk in a mostly-silent commune.

✨ of those things that cannot be spoken-of: do not speak of them.

2026-01-18 19:34:24

Done. Removed 10 polysemous prepositions:

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”

β”‚ Removed β”‚ Why β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ on β”‚ surface vs temporal ("on the table" vs "on Monday") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ at β”‚ location vs time ("at school" vs "at noon") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ for β”‚ recipient vs duration vs purpose β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ by β”‚ agent vs proximity vs means β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ over β”‚ spatial vs quantity ("over the fence" vs "over ten") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ into β”‚ movement vs transformation ("into the room" vs "turn into") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ against β”‚ contact vs opposition ("lean against" vs "fight against") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ behind β”‚ spatial vs support ("behind the house" vs "behind the project") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ before β”‚ temporal vs spatial/formal ("before noon" vs "before the judge") β”‚

β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€

β”‚ after β”‚ temporal vs politeness ("after lunch" vs "after you") β”‚

β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜