the search°hard word for jobs is not°hard word yet°hard word bearing fruit.
part of this is that i am a complicated candidate°hard word, and we are in an era°hard word where many companies don't°hard word feel a need to take on the risks of complicated employees°hard word.
----
for Atacama°hard word, i could try to add LONDON. i could add "ratings°hard word" (like +110 or -20dB°hard word) based°hard word on content°hard word.
after watching the machine fail°hard word once at generating°hard word useful°hard word metadata°hard word for quotes°hard word, I am punting°hard word. for the limited situations where I care, I can enter it manually°hard word.
----
Programming with the LLM°hard word is something of a guessing game.
If I tell it to add a feature°hard word, will it do it correctly? Or, will I have to explain it more and more? Would it be faster to just write it myself?
And, if the machine is wrong, is it because the tool is immature°hard word and incomplete°hard word? Or was the idea incomplete°hard word?
----
more later.