🔥 when in doubt, dig°hard word deeper
The various°hard word reasons why "build an encyclopedia°hard word" are problematic°hard word have already been discussed. 💡 and, if anyone has questions, I will discuss it further°hard word then°hard word.
However, "build a dictionary°hard word" might be more sensible°hard word.
- sort by common words
- aggressively°hard word non-ideological°hard word 💡 which is an ideology°hard word; just not°hard word that of the radical-left°hard word or the radical-right°hard word
- sort by "register°hard word" (slang°hard word words, loan°hard word words, technical°hard word words)
- group by conjugation°hard word, etc°hard word.
- multiple°hard word "levels" of definitions°hard word 💡 a mechanical°hard word approach°hard word to word-lists°hard word might be necessary
----
I don't°hard word have immediate°hard word answers for how are polysemous°hard word words handled°hard word.
- live as°hard word LIH°hard word VUH°hard word or LYE°hard word VUH°hard word
- a physical table v. metaphorical°hard word v. data-grid°hard word v. parliamentary°hard word
- the many meanings of a word like for
----
the User°hard word Interface°hard word ... well, there are two. the query-result°hard word, and the read through. ⚔️ well, actually, I could print a dictionary°hard word. but would it be an improvement°hard word?