https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-presidency-has-become-too-powerful 💡 not°hard word sure I endorse°hard word this post.
It is therefore worth°hard word considering whether Congress°hard word should either take these powers for themself°hard word, in full or at least in part. One interesting reform°hard word proposal°hard word, suggested by UMB°hard word law professor Ben°hard word Yelin°hard word, would essentially°hard word be modeled after the Congressional°hard word Review°hard word Act:
After a president°hard word issues°hard word a pardon°hard word, it would not°hard word go into effect for 45 days.
During that period, Congress°hard word can pass a joint resolution°hard word of disapproval°hard word, which would not°hard word be subject to a filibuster°hard word in the Senate°hard word.
The resolution°hard word would be presented to the president°hard word, who could sign or veto°hard word. In the case of a veto°hard word, Congress°hard word could override°hard word it with a two-thirds°hard word majority°hard word.
If the resolution°hard word does not°hard word pass or veto°hard word is sustained°hard word, the pardon°hard word goes into effect.
If resolution°hard word is signed or veto°hard word overridden°hard word, the president°hard word cannot°hard word issue°hard word a pardon°hard word for that individual°hard word for the remainder°hard word of that term.
The whole°hard word "not°hard word subject to a filibuster°hard word" clause°hard word is problematic°hard word, because the filibuster°hard word isn't°hard word in the constitution°hard word. Also, asking the president°hard word to "sign" an over-ride°hard word of his own veto°hard word seems sub-optimal°hard word.