the new "article°hard word" code°hard word is committed°hard word.
this is ... fine.
I'm not in a mood°hard word to write articles°hard word yet°hard word. Or to add the navigation°hard word chrome°hard word to expose°hard word them.
i am also very much not in a mood°hard word to migrate°hard word existing articles°hard word.
----
the new navbar°hard word is too space-consuming°hard word.
presumably°hard word the new option°hard word will be "all channels°hard word" or "select°hard word channel°hard word from drop-down°hard word".
but I don't really like that. 🔥 i don't like the "hover°hard word for sub-category°hard word" option°hard word either
💡 maybe I should consult°hard word a graphic°hard word designer. certainly Claude°hard word can't do it.
🔥 the consensus°hard word of simpletons°hard word is not wisdom°hard word. if three LLMs°hard word agree on a bad approach°hard word, I shouldn't expect it to be good.
----
both "mail server" and "site°hard word dashboard°hard word" seem like too much work for work's°hard word sake.
or, at least, "work-lite°hard word" tasks.
----
meanwhile, commenting°hard word on things like Gary°hard word Marcus'°hard word latest idiocy°hard word seems pointless°hard word. 💡 of course the "pure°hard word LLM°hard word system" isn't going to know today's date unless°hard word it is told that. You might as well be upset°hard word that the dictionary°hard word doesn't know the date. 🔥 if you look away from the sun, you will not see it
----
I am disheartened°hard word by the "get LLMs°hard word to write good CSS°hard word code°hard word" attempts.
Neither the design nor the structure of the output°hard word code°hard word is that good.
Of course, "go from a CSS°hard word text°hard word file°hard word to a visual°hard word design" isn't a trivial°hard word task ... but it isn't that hard.