🔥 Fun°hard word Fact: none of the Founding°hard word Fathers of the United States ever°hard word owned an automobile°hard word.
A case finds that using°hard word an iPhone°hard word to aid°hard word in viewing through tinted°hard word windows of an automobile°hard word is not°hard word a "search°hard word". ⚙️ US v. Poller°hard word, Second Circuit°hard word, 2024 term
This ... is a sensible°hard word and correct definition°hard word.
But, the fact that the Constitution°hard word does not°hard word consider the existence of "personal°hard word vehicles°hard word" is something of an anachronism°hard word.
Should it say anything°hard word? Is the status°hard word quo°hard word (that vehicles°hard word are, per°hard word the 10th°hard word amendment°hard word, regulated°hard word by the states) correct?