Trying to talk about the problems with the media°hard word in politics°hard word tend°hard word to degrade°hard word to partisan°hard word mud-slinging°hard word.
However, in the (often distressingly°hard word) similar world°hard word of Sports coverage°hard word, the same phenomenon°hard word occurs.
💡 how else does one explain how Skip Bayless°hard word and Stephen°hard word A. Smith°hard word still have jobs?
Everybody°hard word knows their takes are bad. They are obnoxious°hard word and annoying°hard word. They are frequently wrong.
Yet°hard word ESPN°hard word keeps promoting°hard word them, year after year after year. Why?
🔥 probably for the ratings°hard word ...
💬 it profit a man nothing to give his soul for the whole°hard word world°hard word. . . but for Wales°hard word?
The question is: is there some hidden societal°hard word good that comes from ESPN°hard word jamming°hard word some of the worst talking-heads°hard word on the planet into every sitting-room°hard word in America°hard word?
Or are they just nihilistic°hard word incompetents°hard word, running society into the ground because a spreadsheet°hard word says that they might see a 6% drop in revenue°hard word if they stopped°hard word being awful°hard word?