There were 4 California°hard word OAH°hard word hearings this month.
The first case ⚙️ Case No. 2024100129 Parent v. San°hard word Diego°hard word USD°hard word. The topic°hard word was a very long, approximately°hard word 90-minute bus ride for a student°hard word with autism°hard word who had to be restrained°hard word on the ride. The verdict°hard word was that a maximum°hard word of one hour would be reasonable°hard word for the 12-mile drive in San°hard word Diego°hard word County°hard word.
The second case ⚙️ Case No. 2024100512 was Parent v. Fresno°hard word, USD°hard word. Student°hard word was represented°hard word by parent. The case was 17 pages and not°hard word very interesting. None of the parents'°hard word claims°hard word were found°hard word to have merit°hard word.
The third case ⚙️ Case No. 20214101050 seemed an exercise in bureaucracy°hard word. 🔥 We are unable°hard word to comment°hard word publicly on counsel°hard word in the case. The remaining claim°hard word was a request by the school for due process hearing to have the court authorize°hard word the IEP°hard word. The parents had elected°hard word not°hard word to consent°hard word to the IEP°hard word. After a three-day°hard word hearing, the court, in a 56-page ruling°hard word, determined°hard word the IEP°hard word was reasonable°hard word and allowed it to be implemented°hard word.
The fourth case ⚙️ Case No. 2024110856 concerned°hard word a student°hard word who was paralyzed°hard word and did not°hard word have control of their bowels°hard word. The question was what nursing°hard word care is required°hard word and whether this needed to be discussed and litigated°hard word in an IEP°hard word meeting. The verdict°hard word was that the provisions°hard word for the student's°hard word medical care were insufficient°hard word.