specialization is for insects

We live in a world^°hard word that expects everyone to be specialized in politics^°hard word. This is a worrisome^°hard word thing. How can a democracy^°hard word work when a majority^°hard word of the people are disengaged^°hard word from the national^°hard word issues^°hard word that drive voting^°hard word?

Perhaps the answer is that it can't^°hard word; a more staged^°hard word system, where the people elect^°hard word ward^°hard word/city chiefs, and the chiefs vote^°hard word on a candidate^°hard word, might be better. 💡 but the flaw^°hard word there is obvious; the same capture^°hard word as^°hard word the various^°hard word political parties have had at their National^°hard word Convention^°hard word regarding^°hard word the Presidential^°hard word Candidate^°hard word. ⚙️ it becomes polarized. 100 years ago, people could be selected^°hard word for the convention^°hard word before anyone knew^°hard word the candidates^°hard word for the Presidential^°hard word nomination^°hard word. Today, each faction^°hard word selects^°hard word the luminaries^°hard word who will be required^°hard word to vote^°hard word for their candidate^°hard word.

----

The idea of "governance^°hard word by per-profession^°hard word representatives" has its own flaws^°hard word.

We can imagine a "House of Lords" style setup^°hard word, with (say) 200 seats, 12 of which are for medical doctors. Initially^°hard word, they may be selected^°hard word based^°hard word on their skill^°hard word in medicine 🔥 and at getting elected^°hard word. But, after the passage of time, they will be selected^°hard word based^°hard word on their loyalty^°hard word to a faction^°hard word. 💡 this is how Dr^°hard word. Oz^°hard word is in charge of Medicare^°hard word.

----

I have not^°hard word yet^°hard word found^°hard word any flaw^°hard word in the "governance^°hard word by per-birthyear^°hard word representatives".

For example, on a STV^°hard word system, all people born^°hard word 1970-1975 select^°hard word 8 representatives who are members^°hard word of that cohort^°hard word. With a provision^°hard word for alternates^°hard word should a member^°hard word suffer untimely^°hard word death, or (in the case of an inferior^°hard word assembly^°hard word) leave the jurisdiction^°hard word.