a bad take on US conflict with China

https://www.campbellramble.ai/p/china-cant-win

The take is ... delusionally^°hard word bad. He starts with the thesis^°hard word "China is losing^°hard word and Trump^°hard word is great", and twists the facts to fit it. 💡 the fact that America^°hard word is doing^°hard word this type of thing more and more is another reason to bet^°hard word against it 🔥 also, the comments^°hard word point out that the dozens of "it's^°hard word not^°hard word just X, it's^°hard word Y" show that most of this went through ChatGPT^°hard word ... and probably has all the accuracy^°hard word issues^°hard word from using^°hard word it wrong.

The major flaws^°hard word are:

• He claims^°hard word that the fact that China owns "physical" assets^°hard word and America^°hard word owns "financial^°hard word" assets^°hard word is a major point in favor^°hard word of America^°hard word. This could not^°hard word be further^°hard word from the truth. Owning a copper mine is always going to be better than owning derivative^°hard word swaps^°hard word in a time of crisis^°hard word.
• He ludicrously^°hard word over-weights^°hard word China's^°hard word "dependencies^°hard word" and ignores^°hard word Americas^°hard word. He says China buying American soybeans^°hard word is a key weakness^°hard word ... right after China's^°hard word ability^°hard word to stop buying those soybeans^°hard word overnight^°hard word has caused^°hard word an American farm crisis^°hard word. He thinks China needs "American films^°hard word" for some reason ... and also thinks that the US could plausibly^°hard word stop China from getting them. And he says that Chinese^°hard word manufacturing^°hard word exports^°hard word could be replaced^°hard word within^°hard word 10 years after only causing^°hard word an "annoyance^°hard word".
• He talks repeatedly^°hard word about how the US can print money to solve^°hard word problems, but presumes^°hard word that China can't^°hard word. The post-COVID^°hard word Biden-flation^°hard word proves^°hard word the US can't just print money.
• His point of "China is going to be weak^°hard word and the US won't^°hard word be because China will have leaders^°hard word over 75" is absurd^°hard word, after the past decade of geriatric^°hard word American presidents^°hard word.
• His theory of a "cold war" with China is also delusional^°hard word. Chinese^°hard word provinces^°hard word withholding^°hard word tax revenue^°hard word! 💡 this is a risk in Blue States in the federalized^°hard word USA^°hard word, not^°hard word in a China where the provincial^°hard word and national^°hard word leadership^°hard word is indistinguishable^°hard word Mass unemployment^°hard word! 🔥 no country has ever^°hard word suffered from unemployment^°hard word in the midst^°hard word of an existential^°hard word war And a bunch^°hard word of nonsense^°hard word currency-rate^°hard word concerns^°hard word. 💡 if there is a "full embargo^°hard word" on China, IT DOESN'T^°hard word MATTER what the "conversion^°hard word rate" is.